UWP rejects Chastanet’s resignation for second time

anchorashland@gmail.com
4 Min Read


For the second time in four years, the United Workers Party’s (UWP) National Council has rejected a resignation from its political leader, Allen Chastanet.

According to a press release issued on December 8, the council, described by the party as its “highest decision-making body”, met to deliberate on “recent political developments,” including Chastanet’s latest offer to step down. After what the release described as thorough deliberation, the council arrived at a “clear and unanimous decision” to keep Chastanet at the helm until the party’s next convention.

This marks the second time the UWP has declined Chastanet’s withdrawal from leadership. His first resignation attempt came in 2021, following the Saint Lucia Labour Party’s (SLP) electoral victory that year. His most recent offer was submitted last week, amid calls for new leadership following the party’s loss in the December 1 general election, where the UWP secured just one of the 17 contested seats.

The statement, signed by Public Relations Officer Leonard Spider Montoute, emphasised the party’s commitment to stability and renewal. 

“The United Workers Party remains committed to serving the public interest, strengthening our organisation and working constructively toward our shared goals,” the release noted, thanking members and supporters for their continued trust.

Any third-party or user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries published on the St. Lucia Times website (https://stluciatimes.com) in no way convey the thoughts, sentiments or intents of St. Lucia Times, the author of any said article or post, the website, or the business. St. Lucia Times is not responsible or liable for, and does not endorse, any comments or replies posted by users and third parties, and especially the content therein and whether it is accurate.

St. Lucia Times reserves the right to remove, screen, edit, or reinstate content posted by third parties on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times (this includes the said user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries) at our sole discretion for any reason or no reason, and without notice to you, or any user. For example, we may remove a comment or reply if we believe it violates any part of the St. Lucia Criminal Code, particularly section 313 which pertains to the offence of Libel. Except as required by law, we have no obligation to retain or provide you with copies of any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times. All third-parties and users agree that this is a public forum, and we do not guarantee any confidentiality with respect to any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website. Any posts made and information disclosed by you is at your own risk.





Source link

Share This Article
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *